![]() The Ryis roughly 10% faster than the Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600, while the Ryis ~30% faster, representing a massive generational improvement.įiring Back at Alder Lake! I am very disappointed with AMD continuing the bringing back trick, reengineering products, proffering rearchitected RDNA marketing efforts and generally offering lower-cost and lower-performing version models. However, the Rywill have advantages for the productivity-minded, as we'll see in the application benchmarks.īoth the new Ryzen chips offer a tremendous step forward over their Zen 2 predecessors. If gaming is all you're interested in, the Core i3-12100 is the better buy with a much more modern platform - the 5500 is limited to the PCIe 3.0 interface. The less-expensive $129 Core i3-12100 is 6.2% faster in gaming at stock settings than the $159 Ryzen 5 5500, and basically ties the overclocked 5500 without any effort. The Ryfalls within 2 percent of the Ryzen 5 5600G in the 1080p benchmarks, but it isn't as much of a closely-contested battle against the Intel chips. Additionally, you could choose the graphics-less 12400F that offers the same performance as the full-featured model for ~$175, helping reduce the extra costs associated with Alder Lake motherboards. Both the 12400 and the 5600 retail for $199, and that's a tough position for the Rygiven its aging AM4 platform with less sophisticated connectivity. The Ryis basically a 5600X-killer - it doesn't make sense to spend the extra cash for such slim gains. ![]() After overclocking, the 12400 is 3.9% faster than the Ryand ties the 5600X for the overall lead. At stock settings, the Core i5-12400 is 2% faster than the Ryin our overall measurement of 1080p gaming performance, which is a slim victory.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |